Fighting Well and Great Cultures
My observation is that successful teams really find a way to fight well as a constructive norm. They learn how to sort things out together. They do not politically, passively grin at each other, while they know darn well the battles are left to the people that work for them. There is a famous Lencioni video about “one team” that illustrates this brilliantly.
There is a well worn Harvard Business article that is often referred to in this context (published 1997). The authors found that teams with minimal interpersonal conflict were able to separate substantive issues from those based on personalities… “They managed to disagree over questions of strategic significance and still get along with one another. How did they do that? After analyzing our observations of the teams’ behavior, we found that their companies used the same six tactics for managing interpersonal conflict. Team members:
worked with more, rather than less, information and debated on the basis of facts;
developed multiple alternatives to enrich the level of debate;
shared commonly agreed-upon goals;
injected humor into the decision process;
maintained a balanced power structure;
resolved issues without forcing consensus.”
While the above principles remain solid, I wonder if they are sufficient 25 plus years later?
My experience is that these are optimized when supported by adhering to the values of self-accountability, respect, psychological safety and abundance. How come?
The best team members look at issues by asking themselves first, “what can I do about this?” They are self-accountable and see blame as waste. They do not point fingers or act like victims.
They are respectful by seeing the other person and perspective. They are humble to know there is always something to learn and understand through the lens of others. They are compassionate and able to harness their egos. They attack issues and never get personal.
They appreciate that excellence can only emerge in an environment of psychological safety; where everyone is able to bring their best to the path forward. They embrace authenticity, resist perfection, learn fast and openly offer/ask for help.
They are abundant, and per Adam Grant’s research, are givers more than matchers or takers. They look for what’s best in advancing human value and purpose over lining their own pockets.
Yes, the 1997 information is helpful AND ideally we keep evolving. The attribute of “fighting well” is and always will be necessary, constructive and when productive, even energizing. Fighting poorly and destructively leads to burn- out and decay.
Fight well! Embrace the six principles and four values. It’s that easy, and yet that hard.
Think Big, Start Small, Act Now,
Lorne
One Millennial View: While one might assume that a workspace with zero fighting is ideal, I’d like to think that if there’s never any verbal spatting, that’s a sign of a lack of passion.
- Garrett
Search Blog Posts:
Categories
Month
- November 2024
- October 2024
- September 2024
- August 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019